Moral Science; a Compendium of Ethics — Alexander Bain
You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org . If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook. Title : Moral Science; a Compendium of Ethics Author : Alexander Bain Release date : July 15, 2004 [eBook #12913] Most recently updated: October 28, 2024 Language : English Other information and formats : www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12913 Credits : E-text prepared by papeters, Keith M. Eckrich, and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team *** START OF A., Author of "Mental Science: A Compendium of Psychology;" "The Senses and the Intellect;" "The Emotions and the Will;" "A Manual ooof Rhetoric;" Professor of Logic in the University of Aberdeen, etc., etc., etc. 1869 PREFACE The present Dissertation falls under two divisions. The first division, entitled The Theory of Ethics, gives an account of the questions or points brought into discussion, and handles at length the two of greatest prominence, the Ethical Standard, and the Moral Faculty. The second division—on The Ethical Systems—is a full detail of all the systems, ancient and modern, by conjoined Abstract and Summary. With few exceptions, an abstract is made of each author's exposition of his own theory, the fulness being measured by relative importance; while, for better comparing and remembering the several theories, they are summarized at the end, on a uniform plan. The connection of Ethics with Psychology is necessarily intimate; the leading ethical controversies involve a reference to mind, and can be settled only by a more thorough understanding of mental processes. Although the present volume is properly a continuation of the Manual of Psychology and the History of Philosophy, recently published, and contains occasional references to that treatise, it may still be perused as an independent work on the Ethical Doctrines and Systems. A.B. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. THE THEORY OF ETHICS. CHAPTER I. PRELIMINARY VIEW OF ETHICAL QUESTIONS. I.—The ETHICAL STANDARD. Summary of views. II.—PSYCHOLOGICAL questions. 1. The Moral Faculty. 2. The Freedom of the Will; the sources of Disinterested conduct. III.—The BONUM, SUMMUM BONUM, or Happiness. IV.—The CLASSIFICATION OF DUTIES, and the Moral Code. V.—Relationship of Ethics to POLITICS. VI.—Relation to Theology. CHAPTER II. THE ETHICAL STANDARD. 1. Ethics, as a department of Practice, is defined by its End. 2. The Ethical End is the welfare of society, realized through rules of conduct duly enforced. 3. The Rules of Ethics are of two kinds. The first are imposed under a penalty. These are Laws proper, or Obligatory Morality. 4. The second are supported by Rewards; constituting Optional Morality, Merit, Virtue, or Nobleness. 5. The Ethical End, or Morality, as it has been , is founded partly in Utility, and partly in Sentiment. 6. The Ethical End is limited, according to the view taken of Moral Government, or Authority:—Distinction between Security and Improvement. 7. Morality, in its essential parts, is 'Eternal and Immutable;' in other parts, it varies with custom. 8. Enquiry as to the kind, of proof that an Ethical Standard is susceptible of. The ultimate end of action must be referred to individual judgment. 9. The judgment of Mankind is, with some qualifications, in favour of Happiness as the supreme end of conduct. 10. The Ethical end that society is tending to, is Happiness, or Utility. 11. Objections against Utility. I.—Happiness is not the sole aim of human pursuit. 12. II.—The consequences of actions are beyond calculation. 13. III.—The principle of Utility contains no motives to seek the happiness of others. CHAPTER III. THE MORAL FACULTY. 1. Question whether the Moral Faculty be simple or complex. 2. Arguments in favour of its being simple and intuitive:—First, Our moral judgments are immediate and instantaneous. 3. Secondly, It is a faculty common to all mankind. 4. Thirdly, It is different from any other mental phenomenon. 5. Replies to these Arguments, and Counter-arguments:—-First; Immediateness of operation is no proof of an innate origin. 6. Secondly, The alleged similarity of men's moral judgments holds only in a limited degree. Answers given by the advocates of an Innate sentiment, to the discrepancies. 7. Thirdly, Moral right and wrong is not an indivisible property, but an extensive Code of regulations. 8. Fourthly, Intuition is not sufficient to settle debated questions. 9. Fifthly, It is possible to analyze the Moral Faculty:—Estimate of the operation of (1) Prudence, (2) Sympathy, and (3) the Emotions generally. 10. The peculiar attribute of Rightness arises from the institution of Government or Authority. 11. The speciality of Conscience, or the Moral Sentiment, is identified with our education under Government, or Authority. PART II. THE ETHICAL SYSTEMS. SOKRATES. His subjects were Men and Society. His Ethical Standard indistinctly expressed. Resolved Virtue into Knowledge. Ideal of pursuit—Well-doing. Inculcated self-denying Precepts. Political Theory. Connexion of Ethics with Theology slender. PLATO. Review of the Dialogues containing portions of Ethical Theory:— Alkibiades I . discusses Just and Unjust. Alkibiades II . the knowledge of Good or Reason. Hippias Minor identifies Virtue with Knowledge. Minos (on Law) refers everything to the decision of an Ideal Wise man. Laekes resolves Courage, and Charmides Temperance, into Intelligence or the supreme science of good and evil. Lysis (on Friendship) gives the Idea of the good as the supreme object of affection. Menon enquires, Is virtue teachable? and iterates the science of good and evil. Protagoras makes Pleasure the only good, and Pain the only evil, and defines the science of good and evil as the comparison of pleasures and pains. Gorgias contradicts Protagoras, and sets up Order or Discipline as a final end. P