判断力批判 — Immanuel Kant
You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org . If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook. Title : Kant's Critique of Judgement Author : Immanuel Kant Translator : J. H. Bernard Release date : March 8, 2015 [eBook #48433] Most recently updated: October 24, 2024 Language : English Other information and formats : www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/48433 Credits : Produced by Charlie Howard and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive) *** START OF KANT’S CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited LONDON · BOMBAY · CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK · BOSTON · CHICAGO DALLAS · SAN FRANCISCO THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Ltd . TORONTO KANT’S CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT TRANSLATED WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY J. H. BERNARD, D.D., D.C.L. BISHOP OF OSSORY SOMETIME FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, AND ARCHBISHOP KING’S PROFESSOR OF DIVINITY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN SECOND EDITION, REVISED MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN’S STREET, LONDON 1914 COPYRIGHT First Edition 1892 Second Edition 1914 CONTENTS PAGE Editor’s Introduction xi Preface 1 Introduction 7 I. Of the division of Philosophy 7 II. Of the realm of Philosophy in general 11 III. Of the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole 14 IV. Of Judgement as a faculty legislating a priori 17 V. The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgement 20 VI. Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature 27 VII. Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature 30 VIII. Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature 35 IX. Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgement 39 First Part. — Critique of the Aesthetical Judgement 43 First Division. —Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement 45 First Book. —Analytic of the Beautiful 45 First Moment of the judgement of taste, according to quality 45 § 1. The judgement of taste is aesthetical 45 § 2. The satisfaction which determines the judgement of taste is disinterested 46 § 3. The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest 48 § 4. The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest 50 § 5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction 53 Second Moment of the judgement of taste, viz. according to quantity 55 § 6. The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction 55 § 7. Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic 57 § 8. The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgement of Taste only as subjective 59 § 9. Investigation of the question whether in a judgement of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object 63 Third Moment of judgements of taste according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein 67 § 10. Of purposiveness in general 67 § 11. The judgement of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) 69 § 12. The judgement of taste rests on a priori grounds 70 § 13. The pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion 72 § 14. Elucidation by means of examples 73 § 15. The judgement of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection 77 § 16. The judgement of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure 81 § 17. Of the Ideal of Beauty 84 Fourth Moment of the judgement of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object 91 § 18. What the modality in a judgement of taste is 91 § 19. The subjective necessity which we ascribe to the judgement of taste is conditioned 92 § 20. The condition of necessity which a judgement of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense 92 § 21. Have we ground for presupposing a common sense? 93 § 22. The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgement of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense 94 General remark on the first section of the Analytic 96 Second Book. —Analytic of the Sublime 101 § 23. Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that which judges of the Sublime 101 § 24. Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the Sublime 105 A.—Of the Mathematically Sublime 106 § 25. Explanation of the term “Sublime” 106 § 26. Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the Idea of the Sublime 110 § 27. Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgements upon the Sublime 119 B.—Of the Dynamically Sublime in Nature 123 § 28. Of Nature regarded as Might 123 § 29. Of the modality of the judgement upon the sublime in nature 130 General remark upon the exposition of the aesthetical reflective Judgement 132 Deduction of [pure] aesthetical judgements 150 § 30. The Deduction of aesthetical judgements on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful 150 § 31. Of the method of deduction of judgements of taste 152 § 32. First peculiarity of the judgement of taste 154 § 33. Second peculiarity of the judgement of taste 157 § 34. There is no objective principle of taste possible 159 § 35. The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgement in general 161 § 36. Of the problem of a Deduction of judgements of Taste 162 § 37. What is properly asserted a priori of an object in a judgement of taste 164 § 38. Deduction of judgements of taste 165 § 39. Of the communicability of a se